Quoting a famous person in an essay

quoting a famous person in an essay

director of New Yorks International Trauma Studies Program and author of Collective Trauma, Collective Healing. But this collective rise in decibel level has provided a resonance for womens narratives. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight. "So" in this context is colloquial and should be omitted.

The phrase "to be given" is awkward here. The dictionary definition of consent? Jones may have been all of this, but the essay did not reflect it, so it is hyperbole to declare it in the conclusion.

You must be education and country development essay careful not to libel people. The sentence should end after "compute." A new sentence should begin, "For this reason." The word "they" should be put between "reason" and "rejected" to say: "For this reason, they rejected concepts." This sentence is so garbled with mismatched subclauses that adding another is just. It is a pronoun without an antecedent. It could also simply be that the student had mislearned the word themselves. The essay then goes on to discuss these monads in a Christian context. Smith was a religious, Christian man. This is still a bit awkward. "For Passive Resisters" (1907). Sadly, what I see with every new allegation, and with every posting of #MeToo, is another person who may have to cope with the re-emergence of trauma. "18 months" is plural, so it should be "18 months were" not "18 months was." "Predominant" means superior especially in power or numbers. Who were we then?